“We must reject the idea that every time a law’s broken, society is guilty rather than the lawbreaker. It is time to restore the American precept that each individual is accountable for his actions.” Ronald Reagan.

There is a reason why the Left screams loudly and attempts to affix blame on their opponents with false narratives and unfounded accusations in the wake of every tragedy.  If the American people were awakened to the fact the Left and their ideology were responsible for most of the heinous violence and problems throughout our nation their candidates and media accomplices would be soundly and permanently rejected by the American people.  Liberal reaction in the aftermath of the Tuscon tragedy was no different than that after any other tragedy, before the facts are in every Left wing media pundit from the likes of socialists Paul Krugman, Jonathan Alter, Ezra Klein and Dana Milbank to those in the Liberal blogosphere, immediately resort to a template of blaming a non-existent “right wing” threat, their opposition, crazed military veterans and then calling for gun control.  This time they pointed to Sarah Palin, her rhetoric and her facebook page depicting targeted Congressional districts with vulnerable Democrats (even when the Democrat Leadership Council utilized the same illustration before Palin) while also implicating the Tea Party outrage expressed at Town Hall meetings during the summer of 2009.  They derided a climate of “incivility” that they claimed caused the Tuscon shootings.  However, the Left has an extremely short memory when it comes to “incivility”, seeming to be defined by them as anyone who disagrees with their Left-wing agenda. 

The media did everything it could to cover for the perpetrator of the killings, Jared Lee Loughner and his stated love for The Communist Manifesto, Mein Kampf and websites that declared 911 attacks an inside job by President Bush, all Left-wing ideology.  They also disregarded a high school classmate’s observations of Loughner that labeled him a Leftist/Liberal and instead gave great voice to one of Loughner’s close friends, a young man with spiked hair who tried to sell Loughner as an apolitical “nice guy”, a line bought by no one but the media.  This would be akin to asking a devil what he thought of Satan.

The true reason the Left runs this morbid race to control the narrative in the wake of such tragedies?  The best defense is a good offense, which is evident by their post-tragedy spin control.

President Obama read a speech at the memorial service for the victims of the Tuscon shooting, a service that more closely resembled a pep rally where Liberals wearing Obama themed tee shirts clapped and cheered at every other line.  In that speech Obama blamed Americans for what happened in Tuscon that day, scolding us to “act more civilly toward each other”. 

Could Obama have been thinking about his own uncivil words when, during his campaign for the presidency he instructed an audience, “if they bring a knife to the fight you bring a gun”, and to “get in their face”?  Or maybe he was reflecting on the time he told a group of Hispanics that they needed to “make your enemies pay”, the “enemies” were presumably fellow Americans.  Or possibly he was referring to his “bitter clingers” description of middle Americans, or maybe the time when he told the Republicans in Congress who sought to be part of the healthcare debate, “I won, you lost” and to “shut up and go to the back of the bus”, or when he stoked the flames of racial division by stating the Cambridge police officers “acted stupidly” in their arrest of a belligerent Harvard professor Henry Gates, then went further by painting all police officers as racial profilers.  Was Obama harkening to the time that he encouraged his purple shirted thugs at the Service Employees International Union SEIU to picket the private homes of financial executives while threatening them he was the “only one standing between you and the pitchforks”?  Was it civil of Obama, after his repeated use of inflamed rhetoric to ignore the actions of his SEIU friends as they beat and assaulted Americans at town hall functions throughout the country?  Or possibly it was civil for Obama to dismiss charges against the Philadelphia New Black Panthers who engaged in the most egregious voter intimidation ever conducted in this country when they blocked the polling places of white elderly voters clad in military attire and wielding night sticks. Or does Obama find it civil to continual blame others for the condition of the economy while it is his policies that have done nothing to correct it, but have rather further destroyed it?

Could Obama possibly been referring to the class politics of division, rich and poor, minority and white that the Democratic Party bases their existence on?  Or possibly the hateful, violent and incendiary rhetoric of Loughner’s two favorite publications, Mein Kampf and the Communist Manifesto, the source of present day Democrat rhetoric that proclaim among other things, “the bourgeoisie [the rich] forged the weapons that bring death to itself” and encourages “the violent overthrow of the bourgeoisie lays the foundation for the sway of the proletariat”, the sweeping “away by force the old conditions of production” and “the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions”, Not only are these sources the seeds for the current day Democratic Party and its platform, but much of that proclaimed and prominently displayed by Obama throughout his campaign. 

If Obama was not referring to his own incivility, could he possibly be referring to the incivility of his accomplices on the Left, like his former Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, who took a steak knife at a fundraising dinner and speaking of Republicans stabbed it into the table and yelled, “they’re all dead”?  Emanuel also sent a dead fish wrapped in newspaper to one of his opponents, mafia symbolism that preludes a hit.  Or maybe Obama was referring to the eight years of constant Bush bashing by his party and the media, or the liberals that wrote movies and books about the assassination of President Bush.  Maybe Obama was talking about the Leftists that cut off Sherriff Arpaio’s head in effigy at a speech he was giving in Pima county while the loudmouth Sherriff of Pima County, Clarence Dupnik, failed to provide even the most basic of police protection for his fellow law enforcement officer.  Maybe Obama was talking about the civil treatment of the Tea Party by his fellow liberals and media accomplices at CNN and MSNBC in calling them, “Tea Baggers” and “Racists” without any evidence whatsoever.  Possibly Obama had in mind the false concocted accusations by the Democrats of the 111th Congress when they falsely accused Tea Party members of spitting on them and using the “N-word” as those congressional members attempted to intentionally provoke the crowd while taking video never offering an apology for their malfeasance.  Or maybe Obama was thinking of the treasonous and seditious behavior by him and his fellow legislators on the floor of the capitol in their opposition to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, or the outrageous behavior of their media allies in providing passes to code pink members to disrupt hearings, speeches and conventions.  Could Obama have been recollecting the actions of his George Soros funded supporters when they took out a full page NY Times advertisement berating a four star general, General Petreus, calling him “General Betray Us”, was that civil?  Possibly Obama’s speech was referring to his media buddies at Daily KOS, MSNBC and others who day after day and night after night use hate-filled incendiary language to attack their opposition.  Possibly Obama was conjuring how his side and the media habitually attempt to paint their candidates as “brilliant” and “intelligent” while painting their opposition as “dumb” and “ignorant” despite history always bearing out the opposite.  Maybe Obama was referring to how his side and the media destroyed a young, intelligent Dan Quayle’s political career over a “Potato-Potatoe” incident, while intentionally ignoring Obama’s “57 states”, “My plan will reduce your healthcare insurance by 3,000 percent” and other very unintelligent comments made by their candidate.  Or maybe Obama had in mind the despicable campaign of deceit and smear orchestrated against Judges Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas at Supreme Court confirmation hearings in no small part by his current Vice President, Joe Biden.

It is quite likely that Obama was referring to the way that he himself with others on the Left, against the will of the American people, rammed through mammoth pork laden bills boasting new socialist programs that brought with them unprecedented year after year deficits and a skyrocketing national debt.  It was those actions by Obama that gave rise to the Tea Parties across the nation that he and his accomplices loathe, forcing together everyday average Americans from all walks of life concerned with our nation’s future and the ability of our grandchildren and their grandchildren to pay the bill for their financial irresponsibility, the type of dissent wholly envisioned and intended by our founding fathers.  Obama’s candidacy and his first two years in office were the epitome of incivility by him and his accomplices.  The rest of America does not need lectures from the most uncivil among us until they can lead by example.